Sunday, May 24, 2009
Ruth - You were there!
Sunday, May 10, 2009
Thursday, May 7, 2009
We Buried Dear Sanford on May 7th - This is the eulogy as read by Rabbi Dean Kertesz.
Sometimes something simple, a moment, an event, or a choice, provides us with a way of looking at someone’s life. Sanford’s last name, Plainfield, and how he got that name does just that. The family name, Plainfield, isn’t a very old name. Sanford’s grandfather, who everyone referred to as “Old Man Plainfield”, immigrated to the United States from the Ukraine with four sons in the late 19th Century. His name was Yaroshevsky. His oldest son Mark was a medical student and had a lot of problems because of that last name. No one could pronounce it. People teased him about it and one of his professors told him, if he wanted to practice medicine in New England he needed to find a more “American” sounding name. He was so fed up he decided to change it and said, “The first streetcar I ride home will be my new last name.” He rode home on the Plainfield Streetcar. His father, Old Man Plainfield, also changed his name. One brother shortened his name to Yarris, another changed it to Kolitz and one kept the original Yaroshevsky. After the name change, Old Man Plainfield, had a fifth son, Samuel, who was Sanford’s dad. As far as the family knows, they are the only people in the country with that name. I begin with this story because, as I spoke to Mark and Kim about their father, what became clear is that Sanford, in many ways, constructed his life as he wished to live it – much as his uncle and grandfather constructed a new identity as Americans with their new last name.
Sanford Plainfield was born in 1922 in Providence, Rhode Island, the oldest son of Samuel Plainfield and Esther Cohen. Sanford had one brother, Robert, eight years his junior. Family life was not easy or happy. Esther worked as a grocery clerk and. Samuel traded in wholesale jewelry. Neither one had much education. From a very young age Sanford’s father was never around for him. He, his brother, and his mother moved frequently – 25 times by one count, before Sanford graduated high school. But he had great memories of good times with his friends: ice skating adventures and sailing. One of his friends built a boat in his basement only to discover that it was too big to get out. So they took it apart, then reassembled it outside and took it down to the water for its maiden voyage where it promptly sank. Nonetheless this was a clue to Sanford’s lifelong love of the sea and sailing. Every summer Sanford would go to Kansas City to work for his maternal uncle, Max Coe to earn money for college. In fact Sanford began working very early on his life. He was compelled to learn self reliance and because of this grew to be a man that every one else relied upon. Despite his difficult family life, he supported his mother and father until their deaths.
He went to Hope High School in Providence and graduated in 1941. School was really important to Sanford and he excelled. Edna McDonald stands out among his teachers. She was his guidance counselor and taught English literature. She was a real mentor to him and Sanford stayed close to her until she died. I don’t know if she sparked his love of literature or nurtured it but Sanford was a voracious reader his entire life. Mark and Kim remember Sanford reading Edgar Rice Burroughs, Rudyard Kipling, Jules Verne and Mark Twain to them at night.
Sanford’s favorite uncle was Mark, who became the first Jew to be licensed as a physician in Rhode Island. He was a role model for Sanford. Sanford’s oldest son, Mark, is named after Uncle Mark and Mark Twain. Kim was named after Rudyard Kipling’s Kim the Jungle Boy from The Jungle Book.
It may be that Sanford’s tough early years inspired him to be a great father and a loving husband. He was determined to heal what was broken in his past.
Sanford wanted to be an artist. He earned acceptance and scholarships to the Rhode Island School of Design and the Pratt Institute in New York. Kim says that the summer after his graduation Sanford ran across a friend who he had known in high school, who he thought was a great artist, and he told Sanford he was having a hard time making it. Mark says that he may be confusing his dad’s decision with Summerset Maugham’s novel, “Of Human Bondage.” In that story the main character has the courage to ask his teacher whether he is truly talented enough to make it as an artist. The teacher tells the student, “you’re good but you’ll never be great”. In the story the student struggles on to find his true vocation as a doctor. It may have been a combination of the two, but we know Sanford chose to become a dentist and built a remarkable career. He continued to paint and sketch his entire life. He loved art – to make it and to study it, to find opportunities to see it, to integrate into his teaching and to share it with his family.
But first, the Second World War intervened. Sanford enlisted in the Army in October 1942. He tested high and qualified for Officer Candidates School .The Army sent him to Santa Rosa Junior College. That is where he met his beloved Ruth, where they courted, and became engaged. That marriage would last until Ruth’s death just two months ago. They had a passionate and loving marriage. They wrote love letters to each other every day while they were apart during the three years of their engagement. Here is a short passage from Ruth to Sanford on his graduation from dental school that gives you taste of that love, “My love for you carries every faith in your ability to succeed, to heal, to be kind, to understand, to see and hear even when others cannot – every faith that you as a man will be quite singular in your life because you see what is really there…”
Mark described his father as a complete romantic. Kim says that at Santa Rosa Junior College Sanford wore cavalry pants, riding boots, a leather jacket, a white scarf, and sunglasses. He came to his romanticism through his love of literature, his passion for nobility and service, and his urgent need to transcend the world out of which he had come. His favorite musical was “Man of La Mancha.” It spoke to his commitment to being a gentleman, to know that you may be pursuing an illusion but, none the less, you will go after it with great dignity. And Sanford was a great gentleman. He fenced, he rode, he sailed, and he treated everyone he met with gentility and respect.
Sanford originally wanted to be a doctor but a counselor suggested that there were lots of openings for dentists and dentistry was a way to combine his artistic ability with his interest in medicine. The Army and the GI Bill helped him through dental school and he became an oral surgeon. He enlisted in the Air Force during the Korean War and served at Travis AFB as an oral surgeon. Casualties were flown directly to Travis from Korea. Sanford rebuilt the faces of wounded soldiers. It was a pretty tough introduction to his field. His experiences there turned him into a life long opponent of war.
Sanford was self-disciplined. He was fiercely committed to hard work and to doing things well. Hard work was a way out for him; a way to build his life. Here is one example. His college anatomy course was extremely difficult for him. He thought he was the dumbest student in the class, so he never spoke up fearing he would embarrass himself. He wrestled with his doubts alone and in private. At the end of the semester he had the top marks in the class. Far from being the dumbest student, he had the humility to become the best.
He was an excellent oral surgeon, at the top of his field. His son Kim had a keen interest in his dad’s work and Sanford did a lot of dental work on Kim. Kim has seen a lot of dentist since then – and none of them came close to matching Sanford’s skill or technique. He was also an innovator in his field. He developed a technique called tooth transplantation. On a trip to Northern California he met a lumberman in bar who showed him a tooth in his mouth that had been knocked out. The man had washed it off and put it back in and the tooth took root. Sanford took the idea, developed it, and applied it successfully to molars. Once, he went to Paris to give a lecture to a dental convention and a Seattle dentist asked him if he knew this crazy Bay Area dentist who developed tooth transplantation. With characteristic humility, Sanford said no, he hadn’t heard of him. He was also one of the early pioneers of implantology: implanting a permanent artificial root for a prosthetic tooth.
Sanford wasn’t just competent, he was compassionate. Kim remembers when he was four years old and Mark was doing summersaults off the arm of the coach. Kim thought he’d try and he fell and hit his head on the side of the table. He had a big gash – lots of blood. He remembers his dad taking care of him. Taking him to the hospital and staying with him in the operating room during the surgery. Kim felt great comfort in that moment – not just in Sanford’s presence and love for him, but he knew that Sanford knew what he was doing, and would take care of him and that gave Kim confidence. If you visited his dental practice you would have seen huge photo montages of his patients all over the walls. It was Sanford’s way of saying, “your treatment here will involve pain, but you are safe.”
He built a successful practice and then began teaching two days a week at UCSF. He was both a great dentist and a great teacher. He taught in the School of Prosthodontics. Because of the way he approached dentistry he became concerned that UCSF was turning out technicians, rather than doctors who cared about the whole patient. So, innovator once again, he created the School of Dental Psychology. Sanford went back to SF State and earned an MA in psychology. He then developed a curriculum in dental psychology and wrote the textbook for the program, “Totality in Treatment,” in 1965 which was published by UCSF. The program became a standard part of the dental school curriculum. He also founded a free dental clinic, staffed by students, to serve those who couldn’t afford dental treatment – the destitute, people on skid row. He wanted a place where his students could use their skills in service to others and where they could learn dentistry on real people, with tough cases, in the real world.
.He was a strong liberal committed to what he felt was right and what was just. When Kennedy ran for the Democratic nomination Sanford voted for Adlai Stevenson. He was a pioneer organizer of Negro History Week in the Berkeley schools. Maybe it was because he came from Rhode Island, the state of Roger Williams, who was important to Sanford, and his experience seeing the impact of Nazism. Kim says that Sanford never tried to be fair. He just was. Whatever he did was just and right. Mark says that Sanford and Ruth were both dedicated to public service, and they supported and fed off each other.
Sanford loved the sea and anything aquatic: the ocean, and the wind. He loved sailing and was always drawing waves and boats. He was deeply moved at being propelled by the power of the wind and the forces of the sea. He owned a series of sail boats and sailed on the Bay every week, as often as he could. He taught Kim how to sail. He was fascinated by the natural world and loved animals.
During the last part of Sanford’s life he learned to let go. He retired in 1994 because he could no longer keep up with the physical demands of dentistry. It was his fondest hope that he would sell his practice that he had nurtured and loved, to someone he could trust to sustain it and be true its spirit. But the dentist who bought it ran it into the ground. Soon after he left dentistry he retired from teaching at the University. The dental psychology program was dropped. Colleagues died off. When he was no longer physically capable of sailing, he had to give up his sail boat. But he bore each loss and separation stoically and with dignity. He volunteered as a docent at the California Academy of Sciences. He led school kids on tours of the museum. So he continued to teach and stay in contact with nature.
Sanford had physical problems for many years. They began with a bad hip replacement that caused him chronic pain and loss of balance. He suffered a mini-stroke and lost part of his vision. He thought he might be going blind and wondered how he could do art if he couldn’t see? In his dignified and quiet way he decided that if he could feel then he could sculpt. Later, he suffered from dementia. Near the end of his life his leg was amputated. But when asked how he was, Sanford always answered that he was fine. He never answered any other way. He was always just fine. Coming from a hard background, Sanford constructed a full and rich life founded on love, compassion, hard work and loyalty. At the end of his life, facing physical and emotional challenges, Sanford found ways to adapt, to see what he had, and what he was capable of doing, rather than complain or dwell on what he had lost and could no longer do. He was a brave man. Always the romantic, he was a compassionate gentleman. Sanford dignified everyone around him until the end of his life.
From Friends.....
Betsy F.
....."I wanted to take this time to let you know what special people your parents were to Tom & I. As an employee of your dad's I can tell you my nine years with him were the best of all my 35 years of working - I worked with a man I respected every day and one who created class in his surroundings and we also had an element of fun in each day. -------They were both such a class act. We will miss them so very much.".........
Tom & Karen
For Ruth & Sanford.....In your honor a tree is being planted in a National Forest.
With fondest memories,
Toni
In Memory of Ruth Ed & Claire Liska made a contribution to Doctors without Borders
In memory of Ruth a Ulla & Phil made a contribution to Southern Poverty Law Center
We are happy that we had the chance to be with Ruth in the summer of 2007 in Gau Bickelheim.
Franz Maus
On behalf of the YWCA Board I extend our deepest sympathies. Ruth's commitment to the Berkeley YWCA as well as our YWCA was a true gift. Moreover, her dedication to improving the lives of the underserved was remarkable. In Sympathy, K.K.
Just wanted to say how sorry I am to hear of Ruth's passing. She was such a stalwart in the Berkeley Community YWCA and her deep commitment to supporting women alwasy evident. I appreciated her support of our programe at the University YWCA in Berkeley and her willingness to share 'secrets of success' . She was indeed a fine lady. J.W.
...........Ruth was always so kind and thoughful to me and I loved her very much. I have so many happy memories of being at your house for special occasions. Your mother was a great entertainer and she always made every get-together an occasion filled with joy and laughter........Barbara
.....Your mom had a special place in my life and she meant a lot to me. My wife D. also fell in love with her the moment she met her on a visit to Berkely, long ago, shortly after we married. Ruth was special that way. When I first came to Berkeley at the age of 4, we lived on Woodmont Drive, in a rented house your mother found for my parents. Shortly after we moved there I had my 4th birthday party and since we had just moved there, the only other child I knew was my sister B. Ruth came over, all festive, and turned a potentially sad and longely birthday into a rousing success. Ruth also gave me a toy car, what more could a young boy want? But it was not just any toy car - it was a Schuco car, with a steering wheel that turns the front wheels, doors that opened, a trunk that opened and a wind-up motor - it was a work of art, the ultimate toy car of its day. It was probagly the best present I received in my entire childhood, and I treasured it always until I left for college and forgot about it.
My parents were not so much Jewish, as they were profoundly not Christian. So no Christmas trees, no Easter eggs, etc. Enter your Mom: I still fondly remember going to yuor house for Easter egg hunts, which I loved: running around your garden, finding chocolate and goodies. It is funny how these events which seem minor now that we are adults and parents, were so important and influential in our childhood. I know make sure that every year around this time my own daughter gets a chocolate bunny to eat - and it is good Swiss chocolate, too, another influcence of your Mom. The loss of Ruth is indeed a real los to you, to us and to the world.
P.P.
It is impossible to put into words how sorry I feel about the loss of your parents.......T.L.
"We find our soul when that which is most precious is taken away" Thomas Moore
Sutter VNA & Hospice
Saturday, May 2, 2009
Reunited....
Your forever "daughter-in-love",
Maureen
Friday, April 10, 2009
dear ruth....i miss you something terrible. sebastian's birthday was this week and i so missed our routine. the birthday picture i'd share with you first thing...the phone calls - at least 3 back and forth....for a birthday. well...here's seb's picture....sixteen! i can feel you all around us....i sense you all the time but i sure wish you could blog from heaven...
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
Saturday, March 21, 2009
What Ruth Meant to Me
Ruth is mourned by many people, not the least of which is her extended family and circle of friends. She leaves behind two sons and their families, who remember her as being tireless in her support, love and compassion throughout their lives.
The last time I saw Ruth was just a few days before her graduating out of this life. She was in the hospital, in terrible pain. What moves me so deeply, is that Ruth, in excruciating pain, and knowing she is at the very end of her life because she made the choice to terminate dialysis, found the time and energy to give me her support. In her last conversation with me, I heard not a mention of herself, not a mention of her pain. She was saying good-bye to me; she was taking her leave, for all time. She told me: “You are a good woman; I am so glad that Craig found you.” She told me that the important thing in life is to enjoy life to the very fullest.
10 days later at her funeral and wake, both of her sons, Mark and Kim, stood to speak to us of their beloved mother, Ruth. Kim captured the essence of Ruth in explaining that she had the ability, and she did this on a regular basis, to look into the very depths of your very soul. She would see where you were hurting, and she would tell you what you needed to hear, in order to heal your life, to resolve your current difficulties. You would come away amazed at the insight of this woman. A great example of this is when my husband, Craig was in rabbinical school in
This brings us with what we are left with today….which is the loss of Ruth. There are no words adequate to describe what Ruth meant to each and every one of us, her family members. Ruth was the heart of compassion. She was a lion in the cause of Justice. Her departure leaves a tremendous hole in our lives.
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Tuesday, March 17, 2009
Biography of a Spring - Berkeley 2003
It's Friday, January 3, a sunny afternoon, which registered 67 degrees Fahrenheit for the out of doors on my car's interior thermometer, as I stepped out unto multicolored leaves still falling from wonderful, gigantic trees on McGee near Hpkins Street, just a few steps from the entrance to the Berkeley Horticultural Nursery. As i came around the trunk onto the sidewalk I noticed a rose Camellia hidden on a very low branch of a bush at the realty office. Down the street after having bought some chicken for our dinner, there was a baby in a buggy on the sidewalk watched over by its father. I guessed the must have been strolling in this lovely air because the baby's cheeks vibrantly matched the color of the recently discovered Camellia blossom. Getting back into my car, I thought about the lone question I missed yesterday on the Department of Motor Vehicles license renewal exam: Which road is likely to be more icy: at an intersection, or through a tunnel, or over a bridge? Not an experience to be had here on such a spring like day!
Always loved this photo
Monday, March 16, 2009
From Dieter

Dear Maureen,
thank you for a message I would have preferred not to read. At least she has her peace now and no pain anymore. My condolences to you all, in thoughts I am with you. At least I can say that I had the occasion to know a person like her, and the gift that I could call her my friend. I have attached a text you may use in any way you like, as a whole or in parts. Or not at all - just do as you wish. I have passed some lines to the local newspaper. They called me and said that they are going to print an obituary for Ruth.
I wish you strength,
To know Ruth was to admire her love for the region where her roots were. And for its people, in spite of all what had happenend.The past was in her present, and she fought for years to make sure that her family would not be forgotten. Finally she achieved what she had wanted. Everybody who saw Ruth in her beloved Gau-Bickelheim in 2007 could see how satisfied she was that – finally! – the names of her grandfather and her aunt had found a place in the pavement right in front of the house which once belonged to the family. Her grandfather and aunt were both deported and murdered in the camp Theresienstadt, a crime and a loss which had the greatest influence on Ruth’s thinking. She wanted her hometown to remember what had happened, and she had been asking for restlessly for something which seemed more than justified.
Ruth was born in the family’s house on “Der Römer” – “The Roman” in English, as her town’s marketplace is called. She had a lucky childhood, she felt as a part of the town and its population, just like her whole family did. Even half a century later, Ruth still had that strong remembrance of the cozy rural town and the happy days she had had there. She particularly admired her grandfather Isaak, a proud Jew and a German citizen who wrote in his prayer book the names of battles in which Ruth’s father Kurt had fought during World War I in France.
Ruth’s family remained part of the town even when the whole country had begun to follow a government led by extremists. The town’s catholic population held its faith above anything else, the new ideology included, and did not follow the regime’s condemnation of some citizens because they had another confession. Ruth sometimes told the story how she went up the Wiesberg (“meadow mountain”) right behind the town with her friend Katharina. The girls talked about the often repeated accusation that the Jews had murdered Jesus Christ. “How could I believe this”, Katharina said, “my Jesus was Jewish himself”.
Gau-Bickelheim gave protection in a sea of violence and racism, but young Ruth had to travel every day to the elementary school in Sprendlingen, the next town just some miles away. There she learned what it meant to be Jewish. She was isolated by inhuman teachers and fanatic students, and she had to accept that someone like her could not earn better grades than the worst “aryan” children. It is hard to imagine the humiliations under which the girl had to suffer, with sadistic teachers punishing her and making clear that she now belonged to an inferior kind of human beings.
The family could not stay in Gau-Bickelheim, where they still had little to fear. The regime destroyed the businesses of the Jews, watching the trade between farmers and Jewish traders, and using pressure against this kind of commercial relations. The family had to go to Mainz, where they started to prepare their emigration. A first attempt to go to South Africa failed. But then the family was able to leave the region they had loved and which expelled them. They went to the United States, where they had to make a difficult new start - Ruth’s father learned to earn the family’s living as a welder. Finally he found the possibility to work as a wine-grower in California, where Oppenheimers found a new home.
But her grandfather and her aunt had to stay in Germany. That they could not be saved and become victims of the nazi government’s extermination policy was like a wound in Ruth’s soul. For years and years she fought for their remembrance, against an indifference which kept hurting. When a table was placed at the wall of the townhall in 1990, right in face of the family’s house, a new deception followed: there were words about the victims of terror, but no names. It took nearly another twenty years before the town council decided to allow “Stolpersteine” (“stumble stones”) to be placed in the pavement, small brass plates with the names of her beloved ones. One for Isaak Oppenheimer, another one for Klara Lazarus. Now Ruth could be sure: they would not be forgotten in the town where they had lived.
Anybody who has known Ruth could only admire her utter love for the region of her origins, and her awareness of any injustice. She brought both to California and kept it during her life with Sanford, her loved and amiable husband. Our life has become poorer without her.
From Elke Fischer
nur wenige Male zusammen, aber diese Zeit hat gereicht, sie gern zu haben und sich an ihrem herrlichen Humor
zu erfreuen. Es war wunderbar, wie toll sie deutsch und besonders den rheinhessischen Dialekt sprach.
Katharina hat mich heute am Abend noch angerufen, weil sie es immer noch nicht realisiert hat. Sie wird Ruth
sehr vermissen, denn die beiden haben sehr viel zusammen telefoniert.
Nun hoffe ich, daß Sie meine Mail noch erreicht.
Ich wünsche Ihnen, allen Trauernden, die sie gern hatten, und besonders ihrem lieben Mann Sanford alles
erdenklich Gute.
Mit stillem Gruß
Elke Fischer
From Betsy
From Ruth's dear friend Dieter in Mainz, Germany
the local newspaper has published an article about your family in Gau-Bickelheim:
I hope you feel better than you did last week. We still have the "Russian" cold here. Incredible.
The best wishes from Galina,
your friend in Mainz
Dieter
Die Serie ist auch im Internet zu finden unter: http://www.az-alzey.de/region/serie/juedischesalzey
Eulogy

Ruth Plainfield wrote, “I am in a constant state of remembering the past and only addressing what is said at the moment. I am burning with the abrupt, devastating losses of the past and lightheartedly participating in present, everyday conversations. And I choose not to talk about what is gong on inside me. I choose it because there is no point. Talking about it gives no newer truth, no relief.” Ruth Plainfield lived a life that exposed her to the worst cruelties a human being can experience and out of that experience she chose to build a life dedicated to love, friendship, commitment, and justice. She felt an urgency to speak the truth, often felt her words were inadequate, and had to act to make the world a better place.
She was born in her family’s home in Gau Bickelheim, Germany, on January 27, 1925, the only child of Kurt Opper and Gerda Oppenheimer. Gau Bickelheim was a small village surrounded by vineyards, about 40 minutes southwest of Mainz. It was and still is wine country.
She came from a family of wine makers, lawyers, and art dealers. Her family was part of the German-Jewish gentry. They had a good life, but money wasn’t the critical value. Being honorable and having a good name were what mattered. A life well lived meant focusing on people, on friends and family, on entertaining guests. All the women in her family were excellent cooks. Her father made wine and wine was a part of life. Like most German Jews of that time her parents were proudly Jewish – religious practice and respect for the tradition was very important to her father Kurt. But they were also proudly German. Kurt served in the First World War and was seriously wounded, more than once. He had the scars to prove it. His father, Ruth’s grandfather Isaac, recorded the names of the battles in which Kurt had been wounded in the family bible. When signs first went up in the 1930’s saying, “Jews Get Out,” Kurt would go out with a hammer every night and take them down.
At that time the family lived in the city of Mainz, but they moved back to Gau Bickelheim because they thought the anti-Semitism, that had become official government policy, would be less virulent there. The strong Catholic faith of many of the villagers kept them from obeying the racial laws of the Reich. But the impact of the official anti-Semitism of the Nazi regime was unavoidable. Ruth had to attend the regional school Sprendlingen, a nearby town, which was run by the Nazis. For four years, she was the only Jewish girl in the school and she really suffered there. Just one example: Every morning she was made to stand in the classroom while the other students sang anti-Semitic songs. She, like all Jewish children, was not allowed to associate with non-Jews. As she put it, “The overwhelming changes that came into my life in Germany transformed me from a child delighted with living to one who doubted her right to exist.” But, in the midst of that orchestrated darkness, there was a light of human compassion. She had one friend, Katrina a devout Catholic, who snuck out every night to play with Ruth. Ruth asked her, “How can you still be a friend to me?” Katrina responded, “How can I love my Jesus and not love you?”
In December 1937 her father was shown a Nazi newspaper and said it reminded him of the funny pages. He was arrested the next day and imprisoned. Upon his release the family was told that should he ever show any resistance or disobedience against the Nazi regime again he and all his family would be imprisoned for life. A month later, January 1938, the family left Germany. Leave taking was heart wrenching, because they knew they would not see many of their relatives again.
This is some of what we know about what happened to members of Ruth’s family who stayed behind. Caroline Metzger, a survivor of Theresienstadt, told them later about Ruth’s grandfather Isaac’s death in Theresienstadt in February 1943, “In the first few weeks he portrayed great courage. He looked like a ship’s captain in his dark blue suit and captain’s cap. He was admired for his tidy appearance, especially since most men of advanced age no longer cared for their appearance. He always cared for himself. Only sometimes he complained of the small ration of daily bread. I am sorry that I can’t tell you that it was January or February 1943… Mr. Oppenheimer is reported to have died quietly in his sleep without pain or suffering. Generally, it was fortunate among all that tragedy that death came softly without people’s consciousness of the approaching end. Aunt Klara and Aunt Berta also died in the same way in 1942.”
They left Germany in 1938 on the SS Manhattan of the U.S. Line. A cousin in New York, Ilse Herz, sponsored them and brought the three of them to New York. They stayed there for a few days and went to Chicago to visit a cousin before heading to San Francisco. Her uncle, her mother’s brother, Max Jonas was already there and he sponsored them. Ruth’s maternal grandmother was able to get out of Germany after Kristallnacht in 1938 and joined them in San Francisco.
Life was not easy for them here, as new immigrants. Her father was 46 years old. Before emigrating he had studied to be a mechanic and welder because he thought he might never work as a wine maker again. He worked at those trades in San Francisco, but didn’t like the climate. He took a job recapping tires to move to San Jose for better weather and started looking for work as a vintner. He got a job offer from Fountaingrove Vineyards near Santa Rosa in 1941. So the family moved to Sonoma County and lived in one of two houses on the property, surrounded by 400 acres of grapes. It was an eden-like setting and Kurt oversaw the entire wine making process from growing the grapes to bottling the wine. The house they lived in is now gone, but the winery still stands behind a chain link fence, surrounded by an industrial park. It was terribly important for Ruth to lose her German accent. Because of her experiences in Germany she was suspicious of assimilation but assimilated in her own way.
Ruth met her husband, Sanford, at Santa Rosa Community College in 1943. She was studying social work. He had enlisted in the Army and had scored so high in his aptitude test that the Army sent him to the college to continue his education. They first saw each other in the library. The next time he came looking for her he whistled “The Blue Danube” to get her attention. It worked. Their first date was a picnic with her family at Fountaingrove. Let’s just say that Ruth took one close look and knew that Sanford was the man with whom she wanted to make a family and a life. They were engaged and had three years of courtship, while Sanford was stationed at different Army posts around the country. They kept into touch by writing to one another daily. They were married at Fountaingrove in 1946 and first lived in Kansas while Sanford finished dental school. They returned to California in 1947 and settled in Santa Rosa. Ruth worked for Sonoma County Social Services. The family moved to Berkeley in the late ‘40’s and Ruth went to graduate school in psychiatric social work at Cal. Sanford established his dental practice in Alameda. Their first son Mark was born in Berkeley in 1951 and their second, Kim, in 1954. They moved to Montclaire and hated it. It was the McCarthy era. Montclaire had a right wing atmosphere. In 1960 they moved back to Berkeley to the house they had built at 800 Woodmont Ave.
Ruth worked as psychotherapist at UC Berkeley’s Cowell Hospital which became a national model for caring for college students. She said she liked her work because she loved helping people. Ruth and Sanford were actively involved in the Civil Rights Movement. They were part of the effort to desegregate the Berkeley public schools in 1963, the first school district to integrate voluntarily. She started a program at Berkeley High, “Philosophy for Senior Girls” She was deeply involved in her son’s lives. She came to know many of her sons’ teachers.
In the early ‘70’s Ruth founded the first shelter for battered women in Berkeley at the YWCA. She worked with the Traveler’s Aid Society for the homeless and while serving on the United Way executive committee in the 1980’s she worked hard to have the national United Way draft a statement of purpose that it, “was committed to fighting racism by any means necessary.”
Kim remembers that Ruth and Sanford were highly sensitive to racism, oppression, or unfair treatment of any type. He speaks of their constant encouragement not only for himself, but for all who touched the family. He recalls the great efforts she made to become friends with his friends and to know the world in which he moved. She was deeply interested in whatever interested him and did all she could to help him grow in the path he chose for himself. He says that she was always his “greatest fan”
Mark recalls that Ruth intuitively identified with anyone who was oppressed and was quick to make her stand beside them. She was driven to help lift them up, to help them in whatever way she could to become more self reliant and speak with their own voice. She mourned when she saw ties broken and people left behind. He uses words like these to describe his mother: self reliance, justice, loyalty, fidelity, nurturing. He says that she infected him with her power of empathy; that she was incapable of condescension; that her concern and care for people was always a close and very personal thing. She took people to her heart.
Except for the period from 1938 – 1941 she lived well. She kept the family tradition alive of cooking, entertaining, and hosting friends and family. She loved people coming to the house, especially young children. The dining room table in her home in Berkeley was always beautifully set with a table cloth, place mats, cloth napkins, silver napkin rings, and candles. The Jewish ritual that meant the most to Ruth was the Passover Seder with its celebration of liberation and its focus on family and friends joining together in a meal.
Another important part of Ruth’s life was reclaiming her past and demanding recognition of the crimes that had been committed against her family and German Jews in general. Kim once asked her, “How many or our relatives died?” Ruth replied, “They didn’t die. They were murdered.” She returned to Germany for the first time in 1967. She wanted to see it. She wanted to know if anything was left of her childhood. She went for a week on her own while the family stayed in Paris. On the plane she was visited by her father, who died in 1965. She heard him say, “you’re finally going back home.” After she returned from that trip she had difficulty speaking English for a few days. It was a profound experience. Gau Berkelheim was still intact, much the same as it had been in the ‘30’s. And Ruth was reunited with her brave and loving friend Katrina. From that point on her determination to connect with her past, honor her family’s memory and ensuring German accountability drove her.
In 1999 she was interviewed as part of the San Francisco Holocaust Oral Project. Her interview was sent to Germany. A group of 11th Grade students at her former school in Sprendlingen, where she had been tormented 35 years earlier, saw it and invited her to come and talk about her experiences. She accepted the invitation. That meeting was taped and broadcast on German television, closing the circle that had been opened so many years before.
Ruth worked to establish a memorial to the Jews of Gau Berkelheim. Due to her effort the town put up a memorial plaque on the main square, opposite her family home. But the plaque had no names on it; just a general mention of the victims. That wasn’t good enough for Ruth. She kept pushing for complete recognition and true memorial. In 2007 she went back to Germany with two of her grandsons, Samuel and Joel, to see memorial cobblestone markers bearing the names of her grandfather, Isaac Oppenheimer, and her aunt Klara Lazarus placed on the walk in front of the family home she was forced to leave 69 years earlier.
Ruth lived a long life. She experienced the worst humanity has to offer but chose to seek the best in people. She built a beautiful life and made a difference in the world and in the lives of all the people she touched. Ruth leaves behind her husband Sanford, her two sons, Mark and Kim, her daughters-in-law, Vicky and Maureen and her grandchildren: Fernando, Samuel, Joel, Julian and Sebastian. They share her hatred of oppression, her commitment to social justice, to helping others and her love of adventure, philosophy, culture and art of all kinds. They carry on her life. May her memory be an example and a blessing to us all.









